Skip to the content.

Response Comparison Stage (Stage 6)

Overview

The Response Comparison stage implements ensemble diversification techniques to compare and combine multiple response candidates, creating an optimal integrated response that maximizes both quality and diversity. This stage follows the Response Scoring stage (Stage 5) and precedes the Threshold Verification stage (Stage 7).

Components

1. Response Comparison Service

Purpose: Orchestrates the entire response comparison process by coordinating the ensemble diversifier, diversity calculator, quality-diversity optimizer, and response combiner.

Key Functions:

2. Ensemble Diversifier

Purpose: Implements ensemble diversification to create an optimal ensemble of response candidates, balancing between quality and diversity.

Key Functions:

3. Diversity Calculator

Purpose: Computes pairwise diversity scores between response candidates, measuring how different they are across multiple dimensions.

Key Functions:

4. Quality-Diversity Optimizer

Purpose: Optimizes the balance between quality and diversity in the response ensemble using Pareto optimization.

Key Functions:

5. Response Combiner

Purpose: Combines optimized components from multiple response candidates into a coherent, integrated response.

Key Functions:

Process Flow

  1. Input Processing
    • Receive primary response and metrics
    • Check for alternative candidates
    • Generate alternatives if needed
    • Prepare comparison context
  2. Diversity Calculation
    • Compute pairwise diversity scores
    • Measure content diversity
    • Assess structural differences
    • Evaluate emphasis variations
  3. Ensemble Diversification
    • Create optimal candidate ensemble
    • Balance quality and diversity
    • Apply diversification algorithm
    • Include primary response
  4. Quality-Diversity Optimization
    • Find optimal trade-offs
    • Apply Pareto optimization
    • Select optimal components
    • Calculate weights
  5. Response Combination
    • Integrate optimized components
    • Preserve response structure
    • Organize into sections
    • Ensure coherence
  6. Output Generation
    • Combine all metrics
    • Calculate contribution ratios
    • Track component sources
    • Prepare final response

Key Algorithms

Greedy Diversification

The greedy algorithm iteratively selects candidates that maximize marginal contribution to the ensemble:

  1. Start with the primary response
  2. For each subsequent selection, choose the candidate that maximizes:

    score = quality * alpha + average_diversity * (1 - alpha)

Maximal Marginal Relevance (MMR)

The MMR algorithm balances relevance and novelty in each selection:

  1. Start with the primary response
  2. For each subsequent selection, choose the candidate that maximizes:

    MMR = quality * alpha - max_similarity * (1 - alpha)

Pareto Optimization

The Pareto optimization identifies candidates that are not dominated in quality-diversity space:

  1. A candidate is Pareto-optimal if no other candidate is better in both quality and diversity
  2. The primary response is always included in the Pareto-optimal set

Configuration

The stage can be configured through various parameters:

{
  "alpha_parameter": 0.7,
  "enable_alternative_generation": true,
  "max_alternatives": 5,
  "ensemble_diversifier": {
    "min_ensemble_size": 3,
    "max_ensemble_size": 7,
    "diversity_threshold": 0.3,
    "algorithm": "mmr"
  },
  "diversity_calculator": {
    "content_weight": 0.4,
    "structure_weight": 0.3,
    "emphasis_weight": 0.3
  },
  "quality_diversity_optimizer": {
    "quality_weight": 0.6,
    "diversity_weight": 0.4,
    "pareto_threshold": 0.05
  },
  "response_combiner": {
    "max_elements": 50,
    "max_sections": 10,
    "preserve_section_order": true
  }
}

Best Practices

  1. Ensemble Management
    • Maintain diverse candidates
    • Balance quality-diversity
    • Track source contributions
    • Monitor ensemble size
  2. Quality Control
    • Preserve primary content
    • Validate combinations
    • Check coherence
    • Ensure relevance
  3. Performance Optimization
    • Cache diversity scores
    • Optimize algorithms
    • Monitor processing time
    • Track resource usage
  4. Integration
    • Maintain metadata
    • Support refinement
    • Track metrics
    • Document decisions

Integration with Orchestrator

The Response Comparison stage implements the AbstractPipelineStage interface to seamlessly integrate with the metacognitive orchestrator:

Example Usage

# Extract the primary response and evaluation metrics from previous stages
primary_response = context.get("stage_outputs", {}).get("solution_generation", {})
evaluation_metrics = context.get("stage_outputs", {}).get("response_scoring", {})

# Perform response comparison
comparison_result = response_comparison_service.process(prompt, context)

# Access the combined response
combined_response = comparison_result.get("content", {})
primary_contribution = comparison_result.get("primary_contribution_ratio", 1.0)
diversity_metrics = comparison_result.get("diversity_metrics", {})

# Forward to threshold verification
verification_context = context.copy()
verification_context["stage_outputs"]["response_comparison"] = comparison_result