Special Language Features in Turbulance
This document describes the unique and specialized features of the Turbulance language that make it particularly powerful for pattern analysis and evidence-based reasoning.
Propositions and Motions
Propositions
Propositions are fundamental building blocks in Turbulance for expressing and testing hypotheses. They represent statements that can be evaluated based on evidence and patterns in data.
proposition TextAnalysis:
// Define the scope and context
context text_corpus = load_corpus("scientific_papers.txt")
// Define motions (sub-hypotheses)
motion AuthorshipPatterns("Writing style indicates single authorship")
motion TopicCohesion("The text maintains consistent topic focus")
// Evidence gathering and evaluation
within text_corpus:
given stylometric_similarity() > 0.85:
support AuthorshipPatterns
given topic_drift() < 0.2:
support TopicCohesion
Key Features of Propositions:
- Hierarchical Structure: Can contain multiple Motions for complex reasoning
- Evidence Integration: Support evidence gathering through pattern matching
- Contextual Scope: Define clear boundaries for analysis
- Composability: Can be combined with other Propositions
- Validation: Built-in support for hypothesis testing
Syntax and Structure:
proposition PropositionName:
// Optional context definition
context variable_name = data_source
// Motion definitions
motion MotionName("Description")
// Evidence evaluation
within scope:
given condition:
support|contradict MotionName
Motions
Motions are sub-components of Propositions that represent specific claims or hypotheses that can be supported or contradicted by evidence.
motion ClimatePattern("Temperature changes follow seasonal patterns"):
// Define evidence requirements
requires:
- temperature_data: TimeSeries
- min_data_points: 365
// Define evaluation criteria
criteria:
- seasonal_correlation > 0.7
- outlier_ratio < 0.1
// Define supporting patterns
patterns:
- "consistent yearly cycles"
- "gradual transitions"
- "predictable peaks"
Motion Features:
- Requirements: Specify required data types and formats
- Criteria: Define explicit evaluation criteria
- Patterns: Support pattern-based evidence
- Reusability: Can be referenced across multiple Propositions
- Validation: Built-in consistency checking
Special Data Structures
Evidence Collection
The Evidence
data structure is specialized for gathering and organizing supporting data for Propositions and Motions.
evidence ClimateEvidence:
// Define sources
sources:
- temperature_readings: Sensor[Temperature]
- weather_reports: TextStream
- satellite_data: ImageStream
// Define collection methods
collection:
frequency: hourly
duration: 1 year
validation: cross_reference
quality_threshold: 0.95
// Define processing rules
processing:
- normalize_temperatures()
- remove_outliers(threshold: 3.0)
- aggregate_by_day()
- calculate_trends()
// Define storage and retrieval
storage:
format: time_series
compression: lossless
indexing: temporal
Pattern Registry
The PatternRegistry
structure maintains a catalog of recognized patterns that can be used for evidence evaluation.
pattern_registry TextPatterns:
// Define pattern categories
category Stylometric:
- sentence_length_distribution: Statistical
- vocabulary_richness: Numerical
- punctuation_patterns: Sequential
- word_frequency: Distributional
category Semantic:
- topic_coherence: Topical
- argument_structure: Logical
- citation_patterns: Referential
- concept_drift: Temporal
// Define matching rules
matching:
threshold: 0.8
context_window: 100
overlap_policy: maximum
confidence_level: 0.95
// Define pattern relationships
relationships:
- stylometric_coherence -> topic_coherence
- citation_density -> argument_strength
Metacognitive Structures
Turbulance supports metacognitive operations through specialized data structures that can reason about reasoning patterns.
metacognitive ReasoningAnalysis:
// Track reasoning chains
track:
- evidence_paths: Graph[Evidence, Inference]
- inference_steps: Sequence[LogicalStep]
- uncertainty_levels: Distribution[Confidence]
- bias_indicators: Set[BiasType]
// Define evaluation methods
evaluate:
- consistency_check(): Boolean
- bias_detection(): BiasReport
- confidence_scoring(): ConfidenceMetrics
- logical_validity(): ValidationReport
// Define adaptation rules
adapt:
given confidence < 0.6:
gather_additional_evidence()
expand_search_space()
given bias_detected:
apply_correction_factors()
seek_counterevidence()
given inconsistency_found:
re_evaluate_premises()
update_inference_rules()
Temporal Structures
Handle time-based analysis and temporal reasoning:
temporal TimeSeriesAnalysis:
// Define temporal scope
scope:
start_time: DateTime
end_time: DateTime
resolution: Duration
time_zone: TimeZone
// Define temporal patterns
patterns:
- periodic: CyclicPattern
- trending: DirectionalPattern
- seasonal: SeasonalPattern
- anomalous: OutlierPattern
// Define temporal operations
operations:
- windowing(size: Duration, overlap: Percentage)
- resampling(frequency: Duration, method: AggregationMethod)
- forecasting(horizon: Duration, model: ForecastModel)
- change_detection(sensitivity: Float, method: DetectionMethod)
Integration Features
Cross-Domain Analysis
Turbulance provides structures for integrating evidence and patterns across different domains:
cross_domain_analysis GenomicsToProteomics:
// Define domain mappings
map:
dna_sequence -> amino_acids:
using: genetic_code
validate: codon_integrity
confidence: sequence_quality
gene_expression -> protein_abundance:
using: translation_rates
validate: experimental_correlation
confidence: measurement_precision
// Define cross-domain patterns
patterns:
- sequence_conservation: Evolutionary
- functional_motifs: Structural
- regulatory_elements: Control
- pathogenic_variants: Clinical
// Define integration rules
integrate:
- align_sequences(algorithm: "muscle", gap_penalty: -2)
- predict_structures(method: "alphafold", confidence_cutoff: 0.7)
- validate_functions(database: "uniprot", evidence_level: "experimental")
- correlate_phenotypes(statistical_test: "pearson", p_value: 0.05)
Evidence Integration
The EvidenceIntegrator
structure combines evidence from multiple sources:
evidence_integrator MultiModalAnalysis:
// Define evidence sources
sources:
- text_analysis: TextEvidence
- numerical_data: NumericEvidence
- pattern_matches: PatternEvidence
- expert_knowledge: ExpertEvidence
- experimental_results: EmpiricEvidence
// Define integration methods
methods:
- weighted_combination:
weights: source_reliability
normalization: z_score
- bayesian_update:
prior: uniform_distribution
likelihood: evidence_strength
- confidence_pooling:
aggregation: weighted_average
uncertainty: propagated
- consensus_building:
agreement_threshold: 0.75
conflict_resolution: expert_override
// Define validation rules
validate:
- cross_reference_check: mandatory
- consistency_verification: strict
- uncertainty_propagation: mathematical
- bias_assessment: systematic
Orchestration Structures
Manage complex analytical workflows:
orchestration AnalysisWorkflow:
// Define workflow stages
stages:
- data_ingestion: DataIngestion
- preprocessing: DataCleaning
- analysis: CoreAnalysis
- validation: ResultValidation
- reporting: ReportGeneration
// Define dependencies
dependencies:
preprocessing: [data_ingestion]
analysis: [preprocessing]
validation: [analysis]
reporting: [validation]
// Define error handling
error_handling:
retry_policy: exponential_backoff
fallback_strategy: graceful_degradation
notification: alert_system
// Define monitoring
monitoring:
progress_tracking: stage_completion
performance_metrics: execution_time
resource_usage: memory_cpu
quality_metrics: result_accuracy
Advanced Language Constructs
Conditional Evidence Evaluation
given condition_set:
within scope:
when pattern_matches:
collect evidence_type
weight by confidence_factor
otherwise:
seek alternative_evidence
flag uncertainty
Pattern Composition
compose_pattern ComplexPattern:
from:
- base_pattern: SimplePattern
- modifier_pattern: ModificationPattern
combine:
operation: intersection
threshold: 0.8
validation: cross_validation
result:
confidence: computed_confidence
applicability: domain_scope
Evidence Chains
evidence_chain CausalChain:
start: initial_evidence
link evidence_a -> evidence_b:
relationship: causal
strength: 0.85
validation: experimental
link evidence_b -> conclusion:
relationship: supportive
strength: 0.92
validation: logical
validate:
consistency: transitive_consistency
strength: minimum_chain_strength
bias: systematic_bias_check
Best Practices
1. Proposition Design
- Focus: Keep propositions focused and testable
- Evidence: Define clear evidence requirements
- Hierarchy: Use hierarchical structure for complex hypotheses
- Validation: Include explicit validation criteria
2. Motion Structure
- Criteria: Make explicit criteria for support/contradiction
- Requirements: Include validation requirements
- Patterns: Define clear pattern expectations
- Reusability: Design for cross-proposition use
3. Evidence Handling
- Provenance: Maintain clear provenance chains
- Uncertainty: Include uncertainty measures
- Processing: Document all processing steps
- Quality: Implement quality assurance measures
4. Pattern Management
- Naming: Use consistent naming conventions
- Relationships: Document pattern relationships
- Validation: Include validation criteria
- Versioning: Maintain pattern version control
5. Integration Guidelines
- Mapping: Verify cross-domain mappings
- Transformation: Document transformation rules
- Traceability: Maintain full traceability
- Validation: Implement comprehensive validation
Performance Considerations
Memory Management
// Use streaming for large datasets
stream large_dataset:
chunk_size: 10000
buffer_policy: circular
memory_limit: "2GB"
// Implement lazy evaluation
lazy_evaluation pattern_matching:
defer: until_needed
cache: recent_results
expiry: 1_hour
Parallel Processing
// Distribute analysis across cores
parallel analysis_pipeline:
workers: cpu_count()
load_balancing: dynamic
synchronization: barrier_sync
Error Handling
Exception Types
exception PatternNotFound:
message: "Required pattern not found in data"
recovery: expand_search_scope
exception EvidenceConflict:
message: "Conflicting evidence detected"
recovery: bias_resolution_protocol
exception InsufficientData:
message: "Insufficient data for reliable analysis"
recovery: data_augmentation_strategy
Examples
See the following examples for practical applications: